My payments go from $1084.19 to $1411.18 per month.
Let's foreclose on the house, put it into the hands of a "Custodian" and charge a reasonable "Capital Rental" to the "Occupier-formerly-known-as-Owner", and then index-link the rental.
At an initial "Capital Rental" of 4% the finance cost is $667 per month: at 3% $500.00 and so on.
Anything the Occupier pays in excess of the "Capital rental" due buys him Units, and if he wishes, he can always pay the Rental with Units if he doesn't want to, or can't, pay in cash.
The outcome is Units of a "quasi REIT" asset class which the owner of the distressed debt can sell off to long term investors.
The lower the Capital Rental is, the more affordable it is, and the more likely it will be paid.
I reckon a 2 to 3% (index-linked) return could be quite achievable for Units in a "Pool" of over a million homes....
Safe as Houses..... "Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky
The second possibility leads to inflation, but it saves the institutions and allows the system to continue to function.
The first possibility would have knock-on effects as one company's bankruptcy immediately impairs assets on everyone else's balance sheet. You could conceivably end up with everyone filing for bankruptcy protection. That would also be a solution: if A owes money to B who owes money to C who owes money to A it can all be netted out to zero but the required disclosures will only take place if A, B, and C are all in bankruptcy court. But it everyone is bankrupt there will be no credit creation and, again, the economy will grind to a halt.
Another way to get the required "circular claims" disclosures to be made is for the government to pull a Roosevelt:
On March 5, 1933, the day after Roosevelt's inauguration, he called a special session of Congress which instituted a mandatory four-day bank holiday. This act provided for the reopening of banks after federal inspectors had declared them to be financially secure.