With a nationalization you can also cover any hole the fedeal reserve may have.
From a purely technical analysis I am not sure yet that dodd proposal is better than direct nationalziation (nor worse), so if it could be implemented (which can not), what is your take?
regarding the military network, I am with Helen here, I do not see the US rejecting it, even with the US$ dollar losing its status..the idea of a crazy presdent of the US with all those nukes can force other countries to bail out...so the military stays even if the US economy collapses.. unless there is a political decition..which I admit will be easier with a dollar meltdown.
A pleasure I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude
A pleasure. I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude
Selling what back, to whom? I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
- Jake If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.
NB. Because of gerrymandering, the larger number of Democratic held House seats are in effect decided by the primary. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
