Display:
I would swear I mentioned somewhere here the strategic advantage of "conserving" AIG (big, FAT insurer) in Paulson's US TOTAL WORLD DOMINATION um "Blueprint" plan, but I can't locate the comment. I bet it was near the HBOS/Lloyd's M&A announcement. Oh well, I confess I haven't read AIG's AR. But here is an anecdotal report on Roubini's analysis of intangible AIG "assets" in the ONE WORLD SCHEME via CR commenter Kung Fu Panda.

AIG's last annual report reveals that it had written coverage for more than $300bn of credit insurance for European banks. The comment by AIG itself on these positions was that they were "for the purpose of providing them with regulatory capital relief rather than risk mitigation in exchange for a minimum guaranteed fee". Thus, a formal default by AIG would have exposed European banks to large increases in regulatory capital requirements, with possibly devastating effects on their ratings and market confidence. Thus, the US Treasury has saved, inter alia, the European banking system....The crucial problem on this side of the Atlantic is that the largest European banks have become not only too big to fail, but also too big to be saved.

For example, the total liabilities of Deutsche Bank (leverage ratio over 50!) amount to about €2,000bn (more than Fannie Mae) or more than 80 per cent of the gross domestic product of Germany. This is simply too much for the Bundesbank or even the German state, given that the German budget is bound by the rules of the European Union's stability pact and the German government cannot order (unlike the US Treasury) its central bank to issue more currency. Similarly, the total liabilities of Barclays of around £1,300bn (leverage ratio 60!) are roughly equivalent to the GDP of the UK. Fortis bank has a leverage ratio of "only" 33, but its liabilities are three times the GDP of its home country of Belgium.

http://www.rgemonitor.com/euro-monitor/253731/european_banking_on_borrowed_time

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Thu Sep 25th, 2008 at 07:45:54 PM EST
That jibes with what Jim Cramer said about AIG and the European banks.  Could've been very bad.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Thu Sep 25th, 2008 at 07:59:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The comment by AIG itself on these positions was that they were "for the purpose of providing them with regulatory capital relief rather than risk mitigation

Don't tell me you can have an insurance policy instead of hard assets and call that "regulatory capital".

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Sep 26th, 2008 at 04:03:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series