We need new analytic tools and a few new legal structures. For example we need rent models to estimate the value of privileges to guide tax policy. We need legal recognition that mortgaged property actually belongs to both the "owner" and the mortgager. For example, if a bank holds a 50% mortgage on a house they should receive 50% of the tax bill for the value of the land under the house. Analagous splits would have to be made for other privileges.
Taxing privileges would likely tilt wage level negotiations in favor of labor. Untaxed privileges do not suffer much by the passage of time (they may actually benefit) while workers with families do not have the luxury of waiting. Taxing privileges directly on an annual basis would place a time pressure on privilege, which would help labor to negotiate better rates. I.e., we would see an upward pressure on wages rather than the downward pressure we have all been trained to believe is "normal".
Note also that taxing privileged assets would also prevent bubbles of lending on them, which is just the most visible portion of the present rot.
As you will see from my comment here
Who will Hear Us
your previous intervention is not forgotten.
And you will have seen my recent post on the
Land Cafe thread as well, no doubt.
My take is a new approach to direct "Peer to Peer" investment in land rental units will make mortgages obsolete, and give rise towaht is to all intents and purposes a "unitisation" "Land-based" currency, as opposed to (say) John Law's 1705 "land-backed securitisation" currency proposal. "Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky