First, most of the economists in important universities and academia are completely on our side... or at least not on the other side.. ten years ago there were no economists favoring fair trade, strong regualtion, and so on in big U.. now everybody agrees.. Krugman is not alone anymore..
Do not understimate the importance of being in Princeton, Berkeley, etc.. and have these center-left ideas... within five years economists will be like climatologists, people Republicans will have to fight against... and as you may notice the narrative to fight us is very very difficult to create even in the US.
The second thing to notice is that the media meta-narrative (as talkinpoints' boss calls it) has changed in our favour in the US..the cotnrol of the media by right-wing idiotic forces which go uncostested does not exist anymore...
In other words, the advance is clear... the US left should have started earlier to movilize but still..even most of the commentariat in the FT goes against their own editorials...
So,a green economic transition seems possible.
A pleasure I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude
There's the possibility of a tipping point very soon, and I think we're getting very close to pitchforks and torches in the US.
If the reality-based economists started putting out press releases, that would speed things along.
<sigh> A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
Goldman Sachs has admitted the Investment Bank business model is not viable;
PN point, they've declared Investment banking as not viable for them, that is:
I'm distinguishing "Investment Banking" of the Wall Street variety from the kind of "Commercial Banking" that Jerome does.
Properly, Jerome does Investment Banking and Wall Street did Speculation Banking but that's the nature of doublespeak. A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Labor/bg2040.cfm
Does 'Shut the fuck up you mendacious oily toads' count as a serious deconstruction?