Display:
Yes, Obama's fund raising methods and prowess are important and impressive.  Younger politicians are also learning to do likewise.  But for the short term and medium term, a federal system is mandatory in order to have a congress that could even consider actions that impinge on privelige.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sun Sep 28th, 2008 at 11:18:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
In response to that, I'd argue that in any political system, run by anyone, throughout all history, it's almost impossible to consider using the mechanisms of government to seriously hurt the interests of the elite, given that government is almost always a tool of the elite to protect the interests of the elite and to manage the problems of the elite.

The modern system is only unique in that enough non-elites ALSO get something from the system that it is not universally loathed and despised as a tool of oppression.

The debate now is more between neo-feudalist elites and those elites who still believe in the industrial state.

Given that, I'd argue that the "elites buy our politicians" argument is not so useful, and that the "neo-feudalist elites set the terms of debate and prevent the arguments of any other elites from being heard" is the bigger problem.

by Zwackus on Mon Sep 29th, 2008 at 06:20:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series