Display:
The latest volley of shrapnel to hit from this particular implosion is the news that numerous local authorities in the UK had funds on deposit with Icelandic banks.

Ooops.

As of this morning it was unclear how much is in play (a tory was on the Today show speculating that it was at least a billion UKP), but various local govt lobby groups are bending the treasury's ear about getting these deposits guaranteed along the same lines as the private depositors guarantee that Darling announced earlier in the week.

Regards
Luke

-- #include witty_sig.h

by silburnl on Thu Oct 9th, 2008 at 06:15:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
BBC News: Councils seeking Darling meeting
Local authority leaders are seeking an urgent meeting with the chancellor after it emerged at least 20 councils have cash in troubled Icelandic banks.

Their overall investment is hundreds of millions of pounds and they are asking the UK government for the protection it has promised to personal savers.

The Conservatives have warned that up to £1bn in council funding could potentially be in danger.

The Tories talking up the figures at risk is rich since of the top five institutions
Kent County Council, £50m
Transport for London, £40m
Westminster City Council, £17m
Hertfordshire County Council, £17m
Havering Council, £12.5m
all but TfL are Tory-controlled local authorities. Three of these are part of London.

Up to £1bn comes out of the largest pot of money, £50M by Kent County Council, times 10 institutions. The Tories don't even know how to do this properly.

But £200M sounds about okay.

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Oct 9th, 2008 at 06:23:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
times 10 institutions

I mean times 20.

A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Oct 9th, 2008 at 10:35:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
A really sad story on those lines surfaced recently in Sweden.

The city of Oskarshamn has lost something like €30-35 million on some supposedly safe real interest bonds, except for a clause that said that if the seller of said bonds fell onto hard times they would lose all value.

It's even sadder because Oskarshamn is not a wealthy place, but the city government is wealthy (they still have like €130 million in financial assets). That's because they, that's right, sold all their city owned hydro electric power plants 15 years ago. They were initially paid with shares from the company that bought the plants (Sydkraft, later bought by Eon), so not too horribly bad...

But some idiot official who misunderstood what diversification is about and what it's good (and not good) for sold those shares and bought a diversified portfolio. And here we are. </head explodes>

Lessons: city governments should not own shares and bonds. If they have more money than they can spend they should cut taxes. If the citizens feel like specualting on the markets they can now do it with their own money.

And if city governments really do own anything, it should be strategic assests with stable cashflows and without any kind of surprises... like hydroplants.

Grrrr!

 

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Thu Oct 9th, 2008 at 10:22:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series