Display:
That's true. Thinking about it further, I think another factor is that unjustifiable undertakings might tend to stifle accountability: those at the top will hesitate to hold subordinates accountable out of a fear that criticism will reflect badly on their own decision-making.

The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Wed Sep 10th, 2008 at 03:11:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'd say they do that inherently.  If a greater action is unjustifiable wouldn't any part of it be the same?  Basically if you reprimand the Abu-Ghraib people they have a legitimate answer in "well, isn't this whole thing basically the same?"  If you grant the leadership an empathetic character they would be thus disinclined to object.  If you grant them the flawed humanity that is most likely they simply don't give a fuck.
by paving on Wed Sep 10th, 2008 at 03:22:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series