I agree about the WSJ and the NYT, medium term. But for now they still shape the narrative. Oddly enough, it is even possible that the sheer variety of sources of opinion and information will actually reinforce their position as a gatekeeper, given their recognition as "serious" places.
We'll see. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
In re: narrative stuff, a key problem I find with the NYT and, to a lesser extent in the liberal blogosphere, the WSJ -- the "Obama's Going to Destroy Social Security!" panic being, in all likelihood, a great example (insert my "We'll see" as always) -- is the way our medium can often inadvertently amplify the stupidity that comes out of the traditional press.
I think the gatekeeper problem is real, but not terribly significant in its impact on Average Joe. And there's an element of "gatekeeper" to the Big Dawgs in the blogosphere. If you're a news director wanting to know what folks on the blogs are talking about, you obviously aren't going to go sorting through Rude Pundit or Balloon Juice or any of the smaller ones. You're going to hit Daily Kos, Red State, etc. Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin