Display:
As satisfying as it is for all of us to imagine the Powers that Be and Wannabe a hard (or even substantive question), the reality is that the respondents in question are rhetorically so highly experienced (not to mention meticulously trained) that they can effortlessly slide right by any one question, however pointed or pertinent.

So I wonder if CNN would be open to a counter-offer: ET will prep any CNN correspondent for a hard-hitting one hour interview on economics and/or energy with any Davos summit participant (hell, or any other "leader" for that matter), complete with facts, questions and follow-ups to likely waffles.

That should be good for a scoop or two (or at least some nice video footage of one of these characters exposed as out of their depth).

The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman

by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Mon Jan 12th, 2009 at 10:43:18 AM EST
... to imagine ASKING the Powers that...

The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Mon Jan 12th, 2009 at 10:45:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That's a great thought. Far too good for CNN to take it up I suspect.

I think that given that we don't know who will even get asked, the best hope for the question is to be thought-provoking in itself. Maybe it can sow the odd seed.

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Mon Jan 12th, 2009 at 10:50:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
As regards the question in this specific case I agree with you.

However, it occurs to me to wonder if there might not be a niche for this sort of a service after all. As the trad news outlets wither over the coming years they will be forced to shed whatever fact-base skills they still have. It might just be worthwhile for a trad news outlet to source factual stuff to a knowledge aggregator like ET if it would make their product more readable/watchable than the competition's.

The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman

by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Mon Jan 12th, 2009 at 11:00:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
By which time we take over yuck yuck evil cackle yuck.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Jan 12th, 2009 at 11:44:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well that would rather accelerate the process, that's true.

But they're too clueless to notice.

The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman

by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Mon Jan 12th, 2009 at 11:50:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It would make them look too good to the public, the ratings would go through the roof, great swaths of the public will tune back in to CNN for real news.  

Payoff is way too good, they won't go for it.

Offer it anyway, just to see if they nibble.

by NvDem (Ed@igreno.com) on Mon Jan 12th, 2009 at 10:48:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series