Display:
As in alternate.
vista = dog
XP = usable (best windows)
ME  = dog
98 vanilla = usable
95 = dog
Win3.1 = usable
win3.0 = dog
DOS 6.1 = usable
DOS 6 = dog
DOS 5 = usable (best dos)
DOS 4.0 = unusable dog, worst product ever
DOS 3.3 = usable
DOS 3.2 = dog

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Jan 13th, 2009 at 02:20:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Absolutely agree.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Tue Jan 13th, 2009 at 02:23:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'll go with you on XP, even if the interface looks like it was ripped out of a Playskool catalog, but I thought 3.1 and 98 were awful.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Tue Jan 13th, 2009 at 02:24:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Depends what you were comparing it with. Each was noticeably better than its predecessor and was more stable than its succesor.

Comparisons with apple don't count.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Jan 13th, 2009 at 02:37:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, I take it back.  Windows '98 was okay.  Not great, but usable.  3.1, though, was completely nuts to me.  I know Microsoft struggles with the whole "intuitive design" thing (being the company that demands you hit a button labeled "Start" to turn the machine off), but that one was pretty bad.

Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. - George Carlin
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Tue Jan 13th, 2009 at 02:43:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You're right.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Jan 13th, 2009 at 03:25:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series