Display:
nanne:
"EADS has to become a normal company," President Sarkozy said at the Paris Air Show last month, underlining complications caused by the group's unusual management and shareholder structure.

nanne:

Bregier gave few details on how Airbus plans to finance the euro10 billion ($13.26 billion) A350 program. He said the development costs have so far been funded by Airbus and some of its suppliers in a risk-sharing program.

Well, IMHO, the answer is to formalise a risk and revenue sharing programme within a cross-border EADS Partnership framework.

The existing companies get to become John Lewis style staff-owned companies, with all the shares held in trust. That should interest the Unions, I would have thought, melancthon?

They would then become "Managing Members" (or capital users, if you like) of the EADS Partnership.

Governments (insofar as suppliers are unable or unwilling) would invest development capital into each project in return for a proportional "Equity Share" of the revenues from the planes once developed.

They may then sell out their proportional Equity Share "Units" (eg billionths of EADS gross revenues) to more risk averse investors interested in the long term revenue stream from the planes developed.

Such an Islamically sound "Capital Partnership" structure would probably appeal to the likes of Emirates, Etihad, Qatar Airways and so on who are all building massive fleets as strategic investments and have the advantage over most other airlines that they actually have their jet fuel supply locked up.

It's possible to see the evolution of global long term strategic partnerships here where EADS would cease to sell planes, but lease them directly (making more money in servicing than they do in building them, as likely as not) with strategic energy partners; a consortium of service provider partners (airline staff cooperatives) operating the planes; and the proposition for Investors of long term direct participation in revenue streams from air travel.

So the money paid by travellers on EADS planes would simply be shared in agreed proportions by EADS; an Energy Partner; and to the consortium of Worker Cooperatives (Human Capital) who make the whole lot work.

No transactions; no middlemen; Peer to Peer air transport - or maybe Pier to Pier... ;-)

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Sat Jan 17th, 2009 at 07:46:52 AM EST
Such an Islamically sound "Capital Partnership" structure would probably appeal to the likes of Emirates, Etihad, Qatar Airways and so on who are all building massive fleets as strategic investments and have the advantage over most other airlines that they actually have their jet fuel supply locked up.
(My bold.)  How does this work for flights to the USA?  Do they ship refined jet fuel or do they contract with a refinery so that a portion of their crude will be paid for in kind with refined jet fuel delivered to airports in the area?  How does it work for Europe?  

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Tue Jan 20th, 2009 at 09:39:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series