Display:
It's a matter for criminologists, I think. There are benefits to having a large chance of being caught and having certainty that a price has to be paid. The 'broken window' hypothesis is also basically correct.

On the other hand you see zero tolerance being used to destroy communities by taking a large part of the male and a substantial part of the young female population away into prison for victimless crimes.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Wed Jan 21st, 2009 at 11:38:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Zero tolerance works for many things, because people that won't do something illegal if they are the only one will do it if someone else does it.

If there is litter on the ground, people will throw more.
If a car goes onto a previosuly empty bus lane, it will be followed by several more right away.
If enforcement of traffic laws is random and patchy, people will be unhappy to be caught, and won't change their behavior.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Wed Jan 21st, 2009 at 02:31:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
taking a large part of the male and a substantial part of the young female population away into prison for victimless crimes.

The authoritarians transformed "zero tolerance" from an enforcement of existing laws into the implementation of new Draconian laws and regulations.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Wed Jan 21st, 2009 at 03:06:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series