Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

I certainly agree with the idea of reinventing public (as well as private) financing. However the question of the existing debt remains...

"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet
by Melanchthon on Thu Jan 8th, 2009 at 09:42:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Melanchthon:
However the question of the existing debt remains...

It's refinancing existing debt with "Municipal Equity" that constitutes the "killer application" of a "Unitisation" approach....

Refinancing existing debt - a Debt/Equity swap - typically cuts the cost of existing municipal finance by at least 50%, (due to no capital repayment, and a lower rate of return) and probably a lot more.

This would free many billions for investment in new municipal assets (eg in affordable housing, renewable energy and energy savings) - which takes more time, and involves development risk.

Municipal Equity gives us an entirely new asset class with perhaps a 1.5% to 2.5% index-linked return, asset-based - typically on land and buildings in public ownership - and with a rock solid (because it's affordable) municipal rental stream.

"Pools" of such municipal asset rental streams would give rise to the sort of high quality, secure, low risk returns investors are currently trying, and failing, to get.

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Thu Jan 8th, 2009 at 11:38:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Occasional Series