Display:
FT.com / UK / Business - Study highlights buy-out groups' reliance on debt
More than half the profits from some of the UK's biggest recent private equity deals were generated by high levels of debt, while less than a fifth came from operational improvements at the underlying companies.

These are the findings, published on Wednesday, of the first annual report on the performance of private equity portfolio companies, compiled by the British Private Equity and Venture Capital Association (BVCA) in response to political pressure.

The findings underline how private equity, which uses money from investors and loans from banks to buy companies, has been heavily reliant on debt to generate most of its profits from the biggest leveraged buy-outs in recent years.



"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet
by Melanchthon on Wed Jan 14th, 2009 at 03:44:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There's nothing equitable about Private Equity.....

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky
by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Wed Jan 14th, 2009 at 07:02:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Today's Case Study | Bloomberg | 14 Jan 2009

Memory Lane | Bloomberg | 26 July 2007

First Rule of Fin: Debt is Good; Equity is Bad.


Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Wed Jan 14th, 2009 at 09:52:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There's always that desire to use OPM :-))

Hey, Grandma Moses started late!
by LEP (rafifoon@yahoo.com) on Thu Jan 15th, 2009 at 03:41:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The commenters who I used to argue about this with seem to have moved on, but I wrote a diary about this, back in the day. Seems that yet more of the profits of the boom were illusory...
by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Thu Jan 15th, 2009 at 05:47:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This is what happens when you can use creative accounting to skim off the company's wealth as a "performance" bonus.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jan 15th, 2009 at 05:59:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Indeed. The profits may have been illusory.

The bonuses weren't.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Jan 15th, 2009 at 08:03:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
FT.com / By sector - $150bn taken out of hedge funds
Investors pulled close to a net $150bn from hedge funds last month in spite of moves by dozens of funds to halt or suspend redemptions.

The record December figure, equivalent to about 10 per cent of industry assets, extends the run of outflows to four consecutive months and has increased the total net outflow for 2008 to $200bn.

The size of the once lucrative industry has almost halved in the past year, to $1,000bn under management, according to data from TrimTabs Investment Research and Barclay Hedge.

Conrad Gann, chief operating officer of TrimTabs, said he foresaw more redemptions in the first quarter of 2009.

"Approximately two-thirds of industry revenues comes from performance fees and we estimate that 81 per cent of hedge funds were underwater [reported negative returns] last year... Managers have half the assets to work with and remaining assets need to fully recover prior losses before they can earn performance fees."

Many hedge funds have halted redemptions. Paying out large sums when markets are falling would damage remaining investors severely, they say. To meet investors' demands for their money back, the funds would have to sell their most liquid assets, usually equities, regardless of which are the best investments, the funds say.



"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet
by Melanchthon on Thu Jan 15th, 2009 at 07:38:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series