Display:
Richard Morningstar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Morningstar started his career with the law firm of Peabody & Brown (now Nixon Peabody) in Boston, Massachusetts, where he practiced law from 1970 to 1981. He then served as CEO of Costar Corporation, and since 1990 as the Chairman of the Board.[1][3] Since June 1993, Morningstar served as Senior Vice President for Policy and Investment Development at the Overseas Private Investment Corporation. In April 1995, Morningstar was posted as the Special Advisor to the President and Secretary of State on Assistance to the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union. His rank of ambassador was confirmed by the Senate on 11 June 1996. In July 2008, he was assigned as a Special Advisor to the President and the Secretary of State for Caspian Basin Energy Diplomacy. In that capacity Morningstar was a promoter of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. In 1999-2001, Morningstar served as the United States Ambassador to the European Union.[3]

On 20 April 2009, Ambassador Morningstar was named to the position of the Special Envoy of the United States Secretary of State for Eurasian Energy.[4] In that capacity Morningstar represented the United States at the signing ceremony of the intergovernmental agreement of the Nabucco pipeline.[5][6] He has strongly opposed the possible participation of Iran in the Nabucco project.[7][8]

I believe the Monroe Doctrine was about preventing European countries from interfering in the internal affairs of the Americas? I think I'm going to go away and think about proposing a Roemon Doctrine that says...

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Oct 2nd, 2009 at 01:27:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'll be making a presentation next week on the topic of European energy to which I know he will attend.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Fri Oct 2nd, 2009 at 05:08:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
This one?

"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet
by Melanchthon on Fri Oct 2nd, 2009 at 07:34:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... that it was more convenient for the British to be able to just set up the material supply systems they needed in the Southern Cone if the countries were nominally politically independent?

After all, the British tacit support of the Monroe Doctrine in the mid and late 1800's has to be the primary driving force, given that the US was incapable of enforcing it on our own in the 1800's.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Fri Oct 2nd, 2009 at 12:23:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Monroe Doctrine, 1823

For their part, the British also had a strong interest in ensuring the demise of Spanish colonialism, with all the trade restrictions mercantilism imposed. Earlier in 1823 British Foreign Minister George Canning suggested to Americans that two nations issue a joint declaration to deter any other power from intervening in Central and South America. Secretary of State John Quincy Adams, however, vigorously opposed cooperation with Great Britain, contending that a statement of bilateral nature could limit United States expansion in the future. He also argued that the British were not committed to recognizing the Latin American republics and must have had imperial motivations themselves.

The bilateral statement proposed by the British thereby became a unilateral declaration by the United States. As Monroe stated: "The American continents … are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers." Monroe outlined two separate spheres of influence: the Americas and Europe. The independent lands of the Western Hemisphere would be solely the United States' domain. In exchange, the United States pledged to avoid involvement in the political affairs of Europe, such as the ongoing Greek struggle for independence from the Ottoman Empire, and not to interfere in the existing European colonies already in the Americas.

By the mid-1800s, Monroe's declaration, combined with ideas of Manifest Destiny, provided precedent and support for U.S. expansion on the American continent. In the late 1800s, U.S. economic and military power enabled it to enforce the Monroe Doctrine. The doctrine's greatest extension came with Theodore Roosevelt's Corollary, which inverted the original meaning of the doctrine and came to justify unilateral U.S. intervention in Latin America.



A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
by A swedish kind of death on Mon Oct 5th, 2009 at 06:26:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series