Display:
SPIEGEL: Second Afghan Vote Poses Risks for West
The US government had been increasing the pressure by the day. On Tuesday, Afghan President Hamid Karzai gave in and announced he would submit to a run-off election against challenger Abdullah Abdullah. Renewed election fraud could mean a loss of face for the US -- and compromise the West as guarantors of democracy.

The waiting for the official election results in Afghanistan has come to an end. On Tuesday, the Election Commission in Afghanistan decided against President Hamid Karzai -- thus joining the United Nations-supported Electoral Complaints Commission, which had found that around one-third of the votes cast in the country's August presidential elections were invalid. Karzai will now face a run-off election against his challenger Abdullah Abdullah on Nov. 7.

Karzai conceded defeat and said that he accepted the decision of the Election Commission, reversing weeks of refusal to submit to a run-off despite numerous indications of election fraud. The initial results had Karzai winning an absolute majority of 54 percent against 28 percent for Abdullah, who spent years as Afghanistan's foreign minister. Now, though, it has become clear that Karzai's share of the vote was below 50 percent.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 01:10:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Why do they cling to this charade ? Nobody is convinced back here and it only breeds resentment in Afghanistan.

Very not winning hearts and minds ? Can we have an adult in charge of this please  ? I'm sick of this childishness.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 04:09:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Going through the motions of democracy poses risks for The West&treade;... then whyTF do we bother keeping appearances?

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 04:35:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
SPIEGEL's argument in this analysis piece is more that it doesn't remove existing risks, which is fair enough, but not interestingly contrarian as a headline or lede.
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 07:08:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series