Display:
But the shareholders embraced what was obviously a highly risky business strategy.

Did they, or were they decieved?

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 06:52:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Why do you assume the shareholders are any less venal and greedy than the Moody executives?

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 06:54:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
A lot of them are pensioners, or index fund holders, or mutual fund holders, or lots of other people who didn't really have any insight into the company, or even knew they had shares in the company.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 06:57:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Let's see.

Mutual funds in the US can only hold "investment grade" debt securities. A downgrade below investment grade therefore forces a sell-off.

The illusion that there is such a thing as safe investments for widows and orphans to put their pensions is a convenient lie for the financial disservices industry.

Solidarity, dude. It means you get a decent state pension and don't have to gamble your savings chasing a return.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 07:02:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yeah, but Moody's certainly been seen as an investment grade paper!

Pensions need not only be through a flat cash payment from the state, especially as the level will be shook by demographic changes. There's nothing wrong with saving money for your retirement in the stock market, as long as you start shifting over the stocks to bonds a decade or so before you're about to retire.

But anyway, let's keep the pension system discussion to another thread.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 07:06:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Starvid:
There's nothing wrong with saving money for your retirement in the stock market, as long as you start shifting over the stocks to bonds a decade or so before you're about to retire.
Yes, what's wrong is the idea that they are any less risky.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 07:13:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Uh... come again?

It's not like I meant CDO's when I said bonds.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 07:42:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Bonds have less price volatility and the coupon income is steadier than stock dividends, but bonds have default risk. So a bond portfolio has less volatility than a shares portfolio, but if you get defaults you lose big chunks of your portfolio in one go. I'm not sure in the long run one is less risky than the other.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 08:20:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But if German sovereign debt goes belly-up, then you have bigger problems than the value of your pension portfolio.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 08:23:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But German sovereign debt has very low yield compared with other "investment grade" bonds.

So you invest in corporate bonds that yield 5% and then wonder why 1/20 of them default on you any given year :P

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 08:28:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Which is why you have a very well diversified bond portfolio, or a cheap bond fund. You can also make sure the bonds are short term, so you have time to get out if the company/country that issued it starts looking shaky.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 08:41:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Short term bonds are like stop-loss orders: They don't work if everybody is doing it.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 08:53:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Plus they have lower yields to beging with, and they may not even pay an income.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 08:57:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
and they may not even pay an income.

If they didn't, people would always hold cash instead.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 09:17:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Um, and why do people put their cash in long-term deposit accounts?

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 09:22:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Good question, given that they practically pay no interest rate. Convenience and lack of information on the alternatives. Even lack of alternatives, at least here in Sweden.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 09:27:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And zero default risk, given deposit insurance schemes?

Also, you have proven by example that the amount of information and sophistication necessary to do "safe bond investment" properly probably exceeds that of your average widow or orphan :P

I mean, it did exceed that of the average bond portfolio mutual fund manager, to judge by the fallout from the recent crisis...

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 09:46:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
They work when you hold them to maturity, which can be a short time if you buy that kind of bond.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 09:16:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Only for very specific kinds of short-term bonds. If the commitment that they cover is similarly short (secured operating credit, basically), then it works. But if the commitment that they cover is long (investment credit), then the debtor needs to be able to roll over his loans when they reach maturity.

And currently there is no firewall between investment credit and operating credit. Making such a firewall would probably go a long way towards making banking boring again. But that will be then, and this is now.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 10:16:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The better-diversified your portfolio the closer the default rate of the bonds in it will approach the long-term average. So, instead of a lottery you pretty much guarantee yourself a constant default rate.

Starvid:

make sure the bonds are short term, so you have time to get out if the company/country that issued it starts looking shaky
But then you have to sell the bond when it's beginning to lose value.

And if everyone follows the same strategy, at the first sign of wobbliness on the part of the issuer there will be a sell-off and your bonds will lose more of their value.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 08:56:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
So, instead of a lottery you pretty much guarantee yourself a constant default rate.

That's the idea, not the problem. Feature, not bug.

And if everyone follows the same strategy, at the first sign of wobbliness on the part of the issuer there will be a sell-off and your bonds will lose more of their value.

Not a problem if you have short term bonds and hold them to maturity.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 09:23:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Starvid:

Not a problem if you have short term bonds and hold them to maturity.
But you were supposed to be able to sell them when the issuer gets in trouble. So in that case you don't hold them to maturity but instead sell them.

And in a parallel comment you want to receive coupon payments from the bonds which, if they have maturities not exceeding a year, typically won't pay coupons.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 09:29:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If the maturities are short, there will never ever be any need to sell them prematurely.  Companies don't go from solid to shit in a second. If som they weren't solid to begin with and you shouldn't have bought the bond, unless you're into junk bonds.

It doesn't really matter if you recieve a coupon, or if you but the bond for less than you get back from the issuer, at least if the maturities are short (the bond fund I have has an average amturity of 0.15 years).

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 09:53:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Starvid:
an average amturity of 0.15 years
And what's the return on that?

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 09:56:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
About 0.5 % currently. A year ago it was 5 %.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 10:02:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
See also

Modigliani-Miller theorem

The Modigliani-Miller theorem (of Franco Modigliani, Merton Miller) forms the basis for modern thinking on capital structure. The basic theorem states that, under a certain market price process (the classical random walk), in the absence of taxes, bankruptcy costs, and asymmetric information, and in an efficient market, the value of a firm is unaffected by how that firm is financed.[1] It does not matter if the firm's capital is raised by issuing stock or selling debt. It does not matter what the firm's dividend policy is. Therefore, the Modigliani-Miller theorem is also often called the capital structure irrelevance principle.


En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 08:22:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
As with many economics theorems this has the structure

If FALSE then P

by rootless2 on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 08:35:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But Starvid insists on talking within the If FALSE then frame.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 08:39:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Interesting, but it seems to me that just like the efficient market hypothesis, this is the kind of theorem that is disproved daily, just by watching the capital markets in action.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 08:42:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
A lot of them are pensioners, or index fund holders, or mutual fund holders, or lots of other people who didn't really have any insight into the company, or even knew they had shares in the company.

There is nothing wrong with insolvent private pension funds that cannot be solved by better public pensions.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 08:14:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
As long as you're not the one who have to finance the better pension with your tax money. :P

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 08:43:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But I have to finance the pensions with my taxes anyway.

The fact that those taxes are currently collected by the stock exchange does not mean that they are not collected. It only means that the administrative overhead is greater, and introduces a couple of extra middlemen who have to get a cut.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 08:56:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But I have to finance the pensions with my taxes anyway.

No you don't, and with a system where everyone (forcibly) saves money for her own account, you do not have to deal with the intergenerational problems and imbalances arising from a change in the age structure.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 09:25:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The point is that, if you have a system where people expect x% of GDP to be paid out to pensioners, it doesn't matter whether the x% of GDP is obtained from taxes or from the capital markets. In fact, the capital markets have higher overhead costs.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 09:33:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I doubt it. Demographical change seems to be far more damaging to the saving strategy than to public pensions. If the ratio of active and retired persons changes in a tax financed scheme a linear adjustment of the contribution will suffice.
In an asset backed scheme a youth bulge will drive up all asset classes and the following retirement will drop them like lead.

Wait this is important. Someone is wrong on the Internet.
by generic on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 09:38:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Except that youth bulges in a single state strike hard at public pen sion schemes, while the capital markets are affected by the average of youth bulges, and as different countries hit the demograpihic rollover att different times, it will have a smoother effect on capital markets.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 09:55:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In practice that would mean investing outside the EU and probably in non OECD countries. There aren't that many developing countries I'd bet my retirement on being stable for the next forty years.

Wait this is important. Someone is wrong on the Internet.
by generic on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 10:04:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Nope. Lots of non-OECD companies have a very large fraction of their business in developing countries. Like ABB, HSBC, Siemens, AREVA and so on.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 11:04:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No you don't, and with a system where everyone (forcibly) saves money for her own account, you do not have to deal with the intergenerational problems and imbalances arising from a change in the age structure.

No pension fund stockpiles wheat in big silos in the harbour for distribution to retirees. What they stockpile is claims over value. The goods still have to be produced when those claims over value are to be redeemed. Whether those goods are claimed as profits for a pension fund portfolio or as taxes for the government makes little difference to the person who produces them, except inasmuch as government pensions have considerably lower overhead costs.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 10:26:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, many of them, presumably were deceived by the managers of the mutual funds that invested supposedly on their behalf, but it's hard to imagine how a direct investor in Moody's could have imagined that there was a sustainable business model absent magic.
by rootless2 on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 06:57:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
People wanted to be deceived. Both the mutual fund managers and the widows and orphans did.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 07:03:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
However, we do not grant the operators of e.g. Nigerian scams, the benefit of such an argument. The willing gullibility of ones victims is not an excuse.
by rootless2 on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 07:05:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Nigerian scammers aren't serious, and they haven't been to the right schools. They're not supported by a lobbying industry, and a self-referential 'academic' justification and indoctrination industry.

Also, they're not white and not rich.

Apart from that - yes.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 07:08:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And the willing gullibility of government officials and economic advisors who design the incentives (mostly tax) for people to put their savings into the securities markets? What do we call that?

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 07:12:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
and then we go to the willing gullibility of the voters who return such people to office.

A veritable Ponzi scheme of gulls.

by rootless2 on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 07:15:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
People wanted to be deceived. Both the mutual fund managers and the widows and orphans did.

However, the time had come, as in all periods of speculation, when men sought not to be persuaded of the reality of things but to find excuses for escaping into the wide new world of fantasy.

- Galbraith, The Great Crash of 1929

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Oct 20th, 2009 at 08:17:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Recommended Diaries
Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
58 comments

Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
36 comments

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9
2 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
11 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

Recent Diaries
Sarkozy: Enemies Ahoy!
by afew - Feb 10
36 comments

Clipping the wings of a judge
by Migeru - Feb 10
58 comments

LQD: Unsustainable irrigation
by Melanchthon - Feb 9
2 comments

Hunger March wins PR battle
by DoDo - Feb 9
3 comments

Obama wins GOP Primaries (to date)
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 8
11 comments

Romania: protests change government
by DoDo - Feb 8
6 comments

Answers to the Renewable Energy Consultation
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 7

Bristol Pound
by ChrisCook - Feb 7
14 comments

The Imitation Of Germany
by afew - Feb 4
31 comments

Strange Fruit
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 4
14 comments

Murdoch - Outsourcing and Hubris
by ceebs - Feb 3
18 comments

Mismatch with the Natural Gas Market
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 3
22 comments

The Future of Economics
by ARGeezer - Feb 2
191 comments

Desert Island Discs - Helen's distortions
by Helen - Jan 31
49 comments

Gorila
by DoDo - Jan 29
14 comments

Rail News Blogging #7
by DoDo - Jan 29
15 comments

Obama's State Of The Union: LQD
by Crazy Horse - Jan 25
74 comments

Democracy Technology
by gmoke - Jan 24
1 comment

The Hydrogen dream
by Luis de Sousa - Jan 24
49 comments

ET Paris Meet-Up 2012 (2 UPDATE)
by afew - Jan 23
113 comments

More Diaries...
Occasional Series