The funny is already there:
Competing visions of national supremacy have in the past presented a difficult hurdle for forming a far-right group in the parliament. [...] Notably, in the new grouping there is no representation from the Greater Romania Party, Ataka, from Bulgaria's rightist extremists or from the Slovak National Party. "We will not participate in any alliance with any party that is chauvinist towards ethnic Hungarians," said Mr Balczo, "and the Romanians and the Slovaks are very, very strongly against ethnic Hungarians."
Notably, in the new grouping there is no representation from the Greater Romania Party, Ataka, from Bulgaria's rightist extremists or from the Slovak National Party.
"We will not participate in any alliance with any party that is chauvinist towards ethnic Hungarians," said Mr Balczo, "and the Romanians and the Slovaks are very, very strongly against ethnic Hungarians."
WWII comparisons are often of limited value. Nations coalescing in the struggle between two regional hegemons is to be expected, especially if those who stay neutral (Poland, Finland, the Baltics, Yugoslavia) get invaded by either of the two hegemons, or both.
I recall that Vlaams Belang doesn't want to associate with this bunch; now I wonder if the Walloon FN has anything to do with it: what's the relation between the two? *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
