http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=a-path-to-sustainable-energy-by-2030
The comments section has been taken over by very verbose and aggressive (and paid?) trolls, which makes one wonder whether it's actually a practical proposal that threatens the coal, oil, and nuclear industry.
They're completely different concepts. CO2 production, global warming.
God, will the confusion wrought by anti-nukes never end? Align culture with our nature.
asdf did not conflate oil, coal and nuclear. He suggested those industries might be paying astroturfers. Is that unthinkable?
