Display:
Here's something:

BBC NEWS | UK | Education | School tests: who takes what

Why are they called 'Sats'?

Officially they aren't - though that has become the almost universal name for them.

In 1991 the Conservatives had a trial run of Standard Assessment Tasks (hence the acronym "Sats") for six and seven-year-olds in infant schools across England and Wales.

Originally they were practical "tasks" rather than pencil-and-paper tests. In science, for example, groups had to experiment with rocks, feathers, and plastic to see whether they would float or sink in water.

The then education secretary, Kenneth Clarke, changed them to written tests which all pupils could take simultaneously.

So national curriculum testing was born, but the old acronym stuck.

Not to be confused with the totally different SATs (pronounced as initials - "S-A-T" - rather than as a word) used in the US for assessing people's college potential.

Also:

General Certificate of Secondary Education - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) is an academic qualification awarded in a specified subject, generally taken in a number of subjects by students aged 15-16 in secondary education in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. (In Scotland, the equivalent is the Standard Grade.) Some students may decide to take one or more GCSEs before or afterwards; people may apply for GCSEs at any point either internally through an institution or externally. The education systems of other British territories, such as Gibraltar, and the former British dominion of South Africa, also use the qualifications, as supplied by the same examination boards. The International version of the GCSE is the IGCSE, which can be taken anywhere in the world, and which includes additional options, for example relating to coursework and the language used. When GCSEs are taken by students in secondary education, they can often be combined with other qualifications, such as BTECs, the DiDA, or diplomas.


The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Sun Nov 1st, 2009 at 02:58:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And why are the teacher unions rebelling?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sun Nov 1st, 2009 at 03:54:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Because, just like in so many other aspects of policy, the people who know what they're talking about prefer to listen to actual evidence of what works and so have different ideas about what should be done than the politicians.

brown doesn't listen. He's notorious for being a stolid arrogant pussbag.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun Nov 1st, 2009 at 04:34:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
He's notorious for being a stolid arrogant pussbag.

I get to be Dilbert.

Dilbert.com

I have to go tie shopping.


In the end, might makes right. Nothing has changed since the caveman.

by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Mon Nov 2nd, 2009 at 08:37:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Brown defends SATs amid union boycott fears - Education News, Education - The Independent
Both Mick Brookes, general secretary of the NAHT, and Christine Blower, the NUT leader, have declared that "the end is nigh" for SATs tests in the wake of their conference votes in favour of a boycott ballot. They argue a boycott will free teachers from having to "teach to the test" to ensure a good showing in exam league tables - and therefore provide pupils with a broader and more balanced curriculum.

I'm not so plugged into the Brit scene but this sounds an awful lot like the criticisms of Bush's "No Child Left Behind" program, i.e. that it promotes teaching children to perform well on standardized tests, rather than facilitating learning of creative or critical thinking (I have read that in some US school districts, they even cut out physical education and recess and physical education to allow more time for programming the poor kids to take the standardized tests).

In the US at least (and the article seems to imply that it is the case in the UK as well), a general poor performance level of a school's pupils tends to be interpreted solely as a failure of the school, and not as an indication of social deficits.

The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman

by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Sun Nov 1st, 2009 at 04:36:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Mainly the sheer ammount of admin and  paperwork, which seems to add about 15 to 20 hours on top of the marking and teaching  that are the normal week.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Sun Nov 1st, 2009 at 08:38:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series