Display:
Masten Space Systems takes lead in Lunar Lander Challenge

On Friday, only days after NASA tested its next big-ticket rocket, a ragtag group of space junkies in the Mojave Desert flew a bargain-basement rocket ship that could be the real future of spaceflight in the 21st century. Masten Space Systems sent its 10-foot-tall Xoie (pronounced Zoey) rocket soaring over a patch of scrub desert that stood in for the moon, a move that appeared to vault the company into the lead in the $2-million Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge.

The contest is sponsored by NASA as part of its long-range effort to give a boost to private companies in the hope that they will someday take on such routine space tasks as delivering cargo to the International Space Station. Four teams registered for a total of six prize-winning attempts. The potential savings to taxpayers is significant: NASA's next-generation rocket, the Ares 1X, which was test-launched Tuesday, has cost tens of millions of dollars. Xoie and her predecessors have cost about $2 million.
....
The Lunar Lander Challenge requires competitors to launch unmanned rockets from a pad, fly to a different pad and land, then repeat the process, all within a specified period of time....With just minutes to spare of the allotted two hours and 15 minutes, the rocket touched down on its return flight, settling only inches from the center of the landing pad.



As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sun Nov 1st, 2009 at 11:31:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Privatising space research -- another insane folly. The private enterprises won't be any better at handling $20 billion rather than $2 million rocket projects than they are at handling infrastructure projects of similar size.

Interestingly, the Who Should Build Big Space Rockets, NASA or the Private Sector? poll at Space.com (even if non-scientific, not one I'd expect to be freeped) showed only 15% support for having NASA step aside, and 38% evedn want NASA to keep total control.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Mon Nov 2nd, 2009 at 04:56:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That is my sense also.  But I am pleased to see that a small company can produce a rocket assembly that can perform as well as this lander did. Shows that there is still a good group of control system folks out there. This might be a good way to select component and sub-system suppliers or at least new design approaches. Even if NASA develops the rocket, it will be built by contractors.  And I have some doubts about a solid fuel only first stage.  But we don't know what, if anything, we will be doing, unless China looks to get there first. Then the question in the US would be "Who lost the Moon?!"  ;-/

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Mon Nov 2nd, 2009 at 05:15:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And I have some doubts about a solid fuel only first stage.

Yeah, Ares-I doesn't make much sense -- other than as a byproduct of going for Ares-IV/V, with its LOX core.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Mon Nov 2nd, 2009 at 05:35:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series