Display:
I guess I'm always nonplussed about the (highly frequent) articles explaining in the same breath that Europe (or its opinion) is irrelevant and that Europe has to, absolutely, follow the US lead.

Why should the US even care if Europe follows its lead, if it's irrelevant anyway? So either Europe matters (if only as an "international community figleaf kind of way), in which case its positions should certainly be respected to some extent instead of demonized, or it doesn't, in which case why bother.

And the same applies to France.

The real lesson of such articles is that neocons (and neolibs) fundamentally feel threatened by Europe, and endlessly worry about it offering an attractive alternative to their domination.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sat Oct 3rd, 2009 at 10:22:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... on the face of it illogical combination of positions is actually a pastiche of different positions, combining what is told to the reactionary populist elements of the base as part of the framing of support for US militarism and the message to the corporate establishment.

My impression from when I read it far more regularly in Oz in the late 90's is that at one time the Economist would only have had the message to the corporate establishment, but as noted in this piece, over the past decade they have fallen away from being a hard and bright tool of the corporate elite to a lot more muddled party-line "thinking".


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sat Oct 3rd, 2009 at 07:04:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series