Display:
Do you think they are still around?

Well I'm guessing so unless some paleontologist or vandal removed them with dynomite. Here's the picture that ran with the story.

Marié-Hèlene Marcaud and Patrice Landry next to a sauropoda dinosaur footprint discovered in Pagne, north of Lyon, France. Photograph: Hubert Raguet/CNRS

I would have hiked right over these and 'hey big sauropod footprints!' would not have crossed my mind.

by Magnifico on Tue Oct 6th, 2009 at 05:30:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
This picture that accompanied the Reuters story, `Unique' dinosaur footprints discovered, gives a little better overview of the scale of these footprints.


Patrice Landry (R) and Marie-Helene Marcaud, discoverers and members of an amateur science society specialising in geology and paleontology, pose next to well-preserved footprints, between 1.5 and two metres in diameter, in Plagne eastern France October 6, 2009.

Still, these were found by skilled amateurs and not some random person walking around. I think they well deserve the attention they're getting.

by Magnifico on Tue Oct 6th, 2009 at 05:36:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm not quite understanding what I'm seeing.

Is that whole area they're standing in a footprint?

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Oct 6th, 2009 at 07:00:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
arent there four there?

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Tue Oct 6th, 2009 at 07:13:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There even might be a fifth one that´s partially visible.

Geology ain´t hard. :)

by Nomad on Wed Oct 7th, 2009 at 03:49:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Since the largest found until now in Europe were found recently a few dinosaur steps away (about 200km, actually), I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people were actively searching for others.
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Wed Oct 7th, 2009 at 03:12:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I meant: do you think the dinosaurs are still around?

"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet
by Melanchthon on Tue Oct 6th, 2009 at 05:48:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That depends on whether the responder's understanding of Earth's history comes from the bible or not.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Oct 7th, 2009 at 06:39:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It also depends on whether you believe that the Bible contains a complete account of history, or whether you believe that some parts were left out. From Mark Twain's Letters from the Earth
However, the thing that really and finally and definitely determined Noah to stop with enough species for purely business purposes and let the rest become extinct, was an incident of the last days: an excited stranger arrived with some most alarming news. He said he had been camping among some mountains and valleys about six hundred miles away, and he had seen a wonderful thing there: he stood upon a precipice overlooking a wide valley, and up the valley he was a billowy black sea of strange animal life coming. Presently the creatures passed by, struggling, fighting, scrambling, screeching, snorting -- horrible vast masses of tumultuous flesh! Sloths as big as an elephant; frogs as big as a cow; a megatherium and his harem huge beyond belief; saurians and saurians and saurians, group after group, family after family, species after species -- a hundred feet long, thirty feet high, and twice as quarrelsome; one of them hit a perfectly blameless Durham bull a thump with its tail and sent it whizzing three hundred feet into the air and it fell at the man's feet with a sigh and was no more. The man said that these prodigious animals had heard about the Ark and were coming. Coming to get saved from the flood. And not coming in pairs, they were all coming: they did not know the passengers were restricted to pairs, the man said, and wouldn't care a rap for the regulations, anyway -- they would sail in that Ark or know the reason why. The man said the Ark would not hold the half of them; and moreover they were coming hungry, and would eat up everything there was, including the menagerie and the family.

All these facts were suppressed, in the Biblical account. You find not a hint of them there. The whole thing is hushed up. Not even the names of those vast creatures are mentioned. It shows you that when people have left a reproachful vacancy in a contract they can be as shady about it in Bibles as elsewhere. Those powerful animals would be of inestimable value to man now, when transportation is so hard pressed and expensive, but they are all lost to him. All lost, and by Noah's fault. They all got drowned. Some of them as much as eight million years ago.

So the answer is, they are all gone. Drowned in the Flood.
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Wed Oct 7th, 2009 at 06:57:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Damn, what are good satirists like him or Hicks doing dead when you need really one like we do now ?

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Oct 7th, 2009 at 08:27:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series