Display:
FT Alphaville

The most (popularly) insensitive quote of the year award goes to the FSA's liquidity manager, David Morgan.

In a Friday speech on the FSA's new liquidity rules for banks, which will see them buying more government bonds, he said:

Oct. 9 (Bloomberg) -- British banks may pass on more than 2 billion pounds ($3.2 billion) in fees to customers to make up for the costs of implementing tougher liquidity rules, a U.K. regulatory official said.

Banks can charge retail and corporate customers higher rates and fees to maintain profit margins after implementing the rules, David Morgan, liquidity policy manager at the Financial Services Authority, said in London today. The cost to financial firms of using more expensive funding, such as government bonds, may reach 2.2 billion pounds a year under the proposals, according to FSA data.

"This is not a cost to your shareholders in the long term, this is a cost to your customers," Morgan said in a speech. "You will pass these costs on to your customers."

Thanks, FSA!

Putting the idea in even starker perspective on Monday -- albeit with different numbers -- were UBS banking analysts Alastair Ryan and John-Paul Crutchley.

They reckon the costs to bank customers of the new rules are equivalent to a 2p increase in the basic rate of UK tax:



"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky
by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Tue Oct 13th, 2009 at 04:16:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Do you want banking to be a bit more expensive, but safe, or "cheap" and blowing up every now and then?

ie, would you rather pay 2% per year or have massive bailouts every now and then? what's really more expensive to taxpayers?

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Oct 13th, 2009 at 05:00:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's not my bold.

I see future banking in terms of service provision, not credit intermediation. The only shareholder capital necessary would be that covering operating costs.

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Tue Oct 13th, 2009 at 05:47:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
that question was not specifically for you but more general...

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Oct 13th, 2009 at 06:26:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
If they don't do better than in the USA then banking will both be more expensive and more risky.
How about a 50% surtax on yearly compensation over the equivalent of US$500,000.00 and an 80% surtax on executive pension fund contributions with the proceeds going into a reserve liquidity fund .  Allow half of what remains unused to be rebated in ten years.  That ought to concentrate their minds on solvency and liquidity.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Tue Oct 13th, 2009 at 11:17:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Since the authorities have been busy for 2 years protecting management and shareholders, how is this surprising?

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Oct 13th, 2009 at 05:31:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series