Display:
FT.com / Technology - Authors win Google book concession

Book publishers and authors in most countries outside the US won a significant concession late on Friday as Google and American book industry representatives agreed to make changes to their landmark digital books settlement.

The amendments, disclosed in a legal filing in New York close to midnight on Friday, were made after strong objections from the governments of Germany and France, as well as complaints from book industry representatives from a number of other countries, including China.

Other revisions disclosed on Friday reflected complaints from the US Department of Justice, which had warned that the original plan raised "significant legal concerns". Its fears included the risk that the deal would give Google an effective monopoly in the emerging digital books business.

The new plan was immediately criticised as a "sleight of hand" by the Open Book Alliance, a consortium of Google's opponents including Microsoft and Amazon.

"None of the proposed changes appear to address the fundamental flaws illuminated by the Department of Justice and other critics that impact public interest," said Peter Brantley, director of the Internet Archive, which is creating its own online digital archive.

If the revised deal wins court approval, it will make millions of out-of-print works that could previously only be found in a handful of university research libraries available online. While objecting to some aspects of the original plan, which was reached a year ago, the US justice department had applauded the settlement's aim, since it had "the potential to breathe life into millions of works that are now effectively off limits to the public".



The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Sun Nov 15th, 2009 at 12:43:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]
What exactly is the nature of the complaints against Google by authors groups?  Is it that it is violating current, standing copyright protections on these unavailable, out-of-print books, or that they are hoping to extend their (expired) copyright protection at the last minute to cash in now that technology has made it theoretically possible to do so?
by Zwackus on Mon Nov 16th, 2009 at 07:06:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Copyright should lapse on out-of-print books.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Nov 16th, 2009 at 07:12:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No not lapse, revert to the Authors, otherwise publishers will be able to take a book out of print, and then publish again without paying the author once the copyright has lapsed.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Mon Nov 16th, 2009 at 07:55:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In any properly-framed contract (though not all are), the rights in the work can be reclaimed by the author if the publisher ceases publication. They don't usually revert automatically, though.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Nov 16th, 2009 at 08:04:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
June 2009
Sept 2009 1, 2


Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Mon Nov 16th, 2009 at 08:33:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series