Display:
Reading a book on Post Modernism (I'm interested in one of the authors) and ran across this:

In terms of the Marxian formula, it would seem that the superstructural traditions of art have shed themselves in the effort to innovate at a pace in rhythm  with modernity's infrastructural advances in in technology.  To put it simply, are vanished in the high-velocity quest for originality.  Such a quest was inevitably and terminally fatal.

[Due to ...]

In the absence of any aesthetic criteria, money is the only yardstick.  All "tastes," like all "needs," are attended to by the market.

Which strikes me as a piece of analysis having broader application than "mere" Art.  For example, the recent housing bubble relied on the home purchaser to de-privilege "measurements" -- can't think of a better word, right now -- such as community, Public Space, and social support networks.  

by ATinNM on Fri Nov 13th, 2009 at 01:31:46 PM EST
Why does postmodernism require a disclaimer?

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Nov 13th, 2009 at 01:55:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That's exactly what I was wondering!

Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Nov 13th, 2009 at 02:05:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
huh?
by ATinNM on Fri Nov 13th, 2009 at 02:17:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Because "My head belongs to Foucault but my heart belongs to Carnap."

;-)

 

by ATinNM on Fri Nov 13th, 2009 at 02:18:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series