Display:
BBC: We won't charge for online news | Media | guardian.co.uk

The BBC has today said it has "no intention" of charging for online news, in a declaration that is unlikely to please James Murdoch and his father Rupert as they prepare to start charging for News Corporation content on the internet.

Sir Michael Lyons, the BBC Trust chairman, said the corporation has "no intention of diluting BBC commitment to universal access to free news online" as he outlined the areas director general Mark Thompson's ongoing strategic review will cover.



Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Tue Nov 24th, 2009 at 03:12:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Next we will hear about "unfair" competition from state sponsored enterprises.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Nov 25th, 2009 at 12:45:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
"Next"? You haven't been paying attention.....3 months ago, from, well, the BBC.
Mr Murdoch said free news on the web provided by the BBC made it "incredibly difficult" for private news organisations to ask people to pay for their news.

"It is essential for the future of independent digital journalism that a fair price can be charged for news to people who value it," he said.

by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Wed Nov 25th, 2009 at 12:56:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Duh, people are already paying for the BBC News. Via their taxes.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Wed Nov 25th, 2009 at 04:39:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually it's via the TV licence fee.

But you can choose not to pay it by not owning a TV, and still get the benefit of the BBC's web and radio output.

Apparently part of Darth Rupert's plan is to get money from Microsoft, which is willing to pay content creators who put their wares on sale via Bing.

Which seem like a double fail to me - one of those brilliant corporate dotcom ideas that only highly paid but fundamentally clueless executives could think up, and which will lead to billions in losses a few years down the line.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Nov 25th, 2009 at 06:45:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But you can choose not to pay it by not owning a TV

Or by owning one and not living in the U.K. (or in any other country with a compulsory license fee). I'm glad the U.S. doesn't have such a fee, or they'd try to get it from expats as well....

by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Wed Nov 25th, 2009 at 07:48:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Which seem like a double fail to me - one of those brilliant corporate dotcom ideas that only highly paid but fundamentally clueless executives could think up, and which will lead to billions in losses a few years down the line.

Couldn't happen to a nicer couple than News Corp and Microsoft.  Talk about two birds with one stone!

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Nov 25th, 2009 at 11:47:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I recall that article---now.  Recall time can increase with age.  :-)

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Nov 25th, 2009 at 11:49:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series