Display:
and the feeding of grains to animals is entirely driven by profit, which would be less if we took "total cost" into account. After all, force-feeding animals has costs that aren't yet accounted for, however cheap the price.

Also, carbon costing would involve all the extra flatulence from animals digesting feed their digestions cannot process properly.

In the long run, more people are going to have to return to the land and growing their own food, we need to depopulate cities, the south east of england is a joke. But that's gonna need legislation and landowners in Scotland who have stolen good agricultural land to turn into grouse or deer moors will suffer most.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Nov 17th, 2009 at 02:48:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
that's why changing your diet is one of the most incrementally powerful political actions you can take.

...and you feel better physically, once you're 'over the hump'!

~"When an inner situation is not made conscious, it appears outside as fate." Karl Jung~

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Wed Nov 18th, 2009 at 12:50:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series