Jerome asked the question Why a Brit? to answer it with the information that there was probably a trade-off for France involved:
Jerome a Paris:
It looks like the trade off is that Michel Barnier will be getting the Commissioner for the Internal Market and Financial Regulation
Crazy Horse continued his comment I feel robbed, or raped, with:
Crazy Horse:
What ever has Britain done to enhance operation of the European Union?
Jérôme himself said clearly it is legitimate to be anti-Brit
I explained (in more than a little bit of detail) why it was legitimate to fight against a stronger representation of UK appointees in the top European posts, and you call that being "anti-Brit"?
And I hope you won't respond by quoting again my "anti-Brit" title because that's not an argument and you know it. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
