Articles include the mother trying to find a girlfriend for her son with Down's Syndrome, increasing rate of STIs in people 45 plus, trebling of HIV levels in Swindon, the new sex education curriculum (don't let children be withdrawn or taught by religious fanatics and don't let children be brainwashed by gays).
How is sex education and the different constituencies of people represented as a social policy issue and what discourses are being employed etc etc...?
All contributions welcome! Ad astra per aspera
increasing rate of STIs in people 45 plus
A further data point PROVING that there is still a small hope for civilization (assuming that STI means Standardized Tumescent Insertion), that old folk can enjoy life's pleasures somewhat unabated.
We now return you to your writing. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
Looks like we'll have to rerun the experimerriment. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
Any counter-evidence to her thesis from the sources® can be adequately countered by, "A bloke in a pub told me ..."
So further examination of the subject matter could well be lined up, in the pub or elsewhere. Ad astra per aspera
or my kitchen. end arbiturae xochimilco. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
;-)
Something like:
"In the article X, sex education is mention as personal when it comes to the sons [] but as social policy when it comes to []. If we contrast the indivualistic discourse of the sons life with the collective discourse in the social policy setting, we can clearly see that the author employs a [] discourse. This is problematic with the subject at hand as []
On the other hand in article Y...
And then in Z...
And ZZ...
When we lok at these together we can see that while the RED is used when dealing with group A, the MUD is reserved for group B. Interestingly enough the SID does not appear in any of the compared articles. One would have thought that it would have been a useful approach, especially in article Y!"
(Given the topic at hand my stab in the dark would be to use these a lot: RED - the re-distributionist discourse MUD - the moral-underclass discourse SID - the social-integrationist discourse)
And then when you are finished at 03:45, set your computers clock to 23:57 and email away. If the receiver is anything like my professors they will think it was sent that time as that is the timestamp your computer will give it. A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
Can suggest the following procedure:
And if there's a constituency, doesn't there have to be an MP? Say, "the Hono(u)rable Member for 45+ STIs"?
... That wasn't by any chance the constituency in which you were hoping to be nominated, was it? The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
I wasn't after the 45+ STIs constituency to be honest, it wouldn't be honourable surely? Ad astra per aspera
trebling of HIV levels in Swindon
That one's easy.
Have you ever been to Swindon?
