Display:
Reuters: US shoppers spent less over Black Friday weekend
U.S. consumers spent significantly less per person at the start of the holiday season this weekend, dimming hopes for a retail comeback that would help propel the economy early in 2010.

The lackluster spending could pressure retail stocks on Monday as some investors were looking for a stronger showing compared with a year earlier, when consumers were being hammered by the recession and credit crunch.

"There may be a bit of a pullback, a little disappointment," said Patricia Edwards, chief investment officer at Storehouse Partners.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Nov 30th, 2009 at 01:30:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Um, I though I read it on Bloomberg...
Nov. 29 (Bloomberg) -- Black Friday sales advanced 0.5 percent from a year earlier as discounts on televisions, toys and computers drew budget-conscious crowds across the U.S., according to ShopperTrak RCT Corp.
But, as det linked to in that thread...

We Don't Know How Black Friday Sales Were Yet | The Big Picture

Today, the WSJ ran this patently incorrect headline (which many TV stations dutifully (mis)reported:

Black Friday Spending Rose Slightly

Preliminary sales data showed shoppers spent $10.66 billion on Black Friday. That's 0.5% more than last year. The figures were compiled by ShopperTrak RCT Corp., a Chicago research firm that tracks sales at more than 50,000 stores

That's simply wrong. We don't have a clue yet as to how Black Friday sales were. Not even a remotely wild guess.

What the WSJ should have written were words to the effect of:

"An analysis of mall foot traffic suggests that Black Friday saw a slight increase in shoppers. Since we did not analyze actual sales, or even credit card transaction, we actually have no idea how sales did. ShopperTrak's guessed that sales might have been up as much as a half a percentage, but that's just spitballing it.

Every year, various groups -- NPD, Retail Federation, Shopper Track, and others -- release this weak ass data that is almost never correct. And each year, the press laps it up like manna from heaven.



En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Dec 1st, 2009 at 08:54:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I was thinking off that. I think this is a general trend. Statistics tend to be worse when they are reviewed in the US - there's a consistent optimistic bias. The same doesn't hold for Europe, I think we rather have a pessimistic bias.

This leads to a broad overestimation of US economic strength in the press because first impressions weigh heavier.

But I might be wrong!

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Tue Dec 1st, 2009 at 09:45:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series