Display:
Double dip warning - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com
I've never been fully committed to the notion that we're going to have a "double dip" -- that the economy will slide back into recession. But it has been clear for a while that it's a serious possibility, for two reasons. First, a large part of the growth we've had has been driven by the stimulus -- but the stimulus has already had its maximum impact on the growth of GDP, will hit its maximum impact on the level of GDP in the middle of next year, and then will begin to fade out. Second, the rise in manufacturing production is to a large extent an inventory bounce -- and this, too, will fade out in the quarters ahead.

Two stories this morning highlight the risks. The WSJ has a report on highway construction titled Job Cuts Loom as Stimulus Fades:

Highway-construction companies around the country, having completed the mostly small projects paid for by the federal economic-stimulus package, are starting to see their business run aground, an ominous sign for the nation's weak employment picture.

Meanwhile, the ISM for manufacturing suggests that industrial growth is already slowing down.

I'd be more sanguine about all of this if there were any indications that private, final demand is taking off -- consumers, business investment, whatever. But I haven't seen anything suggesting that sort of thing.

The chances of a relapse into recession seem to be rising.



"Ce qui vient au monde pour ne rien troubler ne mérite ni égards ni patience." René Char
by Melanchthon on Wed Dec 2nd, 2009 at 05:07:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
How about "skinny dip warning"? The emperor has no clothes, after all...

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como Espańa entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Dec 3rd, 2009 at 08:45:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series