Display:
Macedonia is the name of a Greek province and that as such it ought not be adopted by anyone else.

Shouldn't they also break off relations with the U.S. until Ohio renames Macedonia, OH?

by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Tue Dec 8th, 2009 at 05:09:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Georgia's on my mind....
by ormondotvos (ormond no spam lmi net no spam) on Wed Dec 9th, 2009 at 01:26:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Not to mention Stockholm.

   

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Wed Dec 9th, 2009 at 05:54:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No, they should not?

When is the last time Macedonia, Ohio invaded and tried to dismember Greece? Does Macedonia still pine for Northern Greece? Anything that gives FYROM a legal right by proxy to make claims on Greece should be absolutely forestalled prior to their entering the Union.

The naming of the country as Macedonia allows it to make claims on Greece in a variety of ways. I know it's easy to comment on this as an irrational issue, but the details are a lot stickier.

by Upstate NY on Thu Dec 10th, 2009 at 10:31:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Slovenia has blocked Croatia's accession negotiations for far less...

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Dec 10th, 2009 at 10:39:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And, oddly, Croatia suggests that Greece enter into arbitration as Croatia agreed to with Slovenia. Maybe Croatia is much better protected than Cyprus was in arbitration in 2004, but since Croatia is outside the EU and Slovenia is in, I expect that the Croatian PM will be eating his words as the arbitrators (I assume the arbitration is binding) tilt heavily toward the Slovenian side.

From what I can tell, international arbitrators are not wholesome and fair all the time. Croatia may be in for a rude awakening.

by Upstate NY on Thu Dec 10th, 2009 at 10:56:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Why has Slovenia been refusing arbitration for so long? I suspect the Croatians were willing to go to arbitration to unblock the accession negotiations as that would be a win for them even discounting the possibility of losing on the actual dispute. Also, you lose less face if you lose in arbitration than if you negotiate a settlement.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Dec 10th, 2009 at 11:07:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The name allows it to make claims on Greece just like "Bretagne" allows France or Britain to make claims on the other. It's the claims themselves that are the problem, not the name. Now, if somebody would at least propose a reasonable alternative (and no, I don't regard FYROM as reasonable) it might be different.

And when Greece complains about an EU event at which "Macedonian salad" was served (which I remember well because it happened when I was visiting Greece at the time), the temptation to make fun of the whole thing is irresistible.

by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Thu Dec 10th, 2009 at 10:55:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
??? The alternatives were proposed and accepted by Greece ages ago. That's old news. New Macedonia, North Macedonia, etc. All are acceptable to Greece.

Bretagne doesn't have the recent history of war and invasion that Greek Macedonia does.

I wrote a comment a while back on the issue that whataboutbob elevated to the front page. Here it is:

http://www.eurotrib.com/story/2009/3/20/112726/173

by Upstate NY on Thu Dec 10th, 2009 at 10:59:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I missed the diary. I think I had seen the North Macedonia suggestion, but hadn't realized that it came from the Greeks. I'm still not that convinced, though. While the circumstances are obviously different, the distinction would still suggest that they are part of the same entity, like North and South Korea, though I now see how that might solve the problem, at least  in the short term.
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Thu Dec 10th, 2009 at 11:11:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]
For Greeks, any possible distinction is a worthy one since they are between a rock and a hard place.

Cave now and go to court for the next few decades with a northern neighbor.

Greece has already endured the enmity of NATO at Bucharest and now the EU.

They paid a price.

It would be highly surprising to see them move from what I believe is a red-line position, i.e. (pick a name, any name).

I would also say that suspicion on both dies is a prime motivator. Seriously, if a single politician in the north could utter the words, Greek Macedonia, it might go a long way toward assuaging fears. And north of the border to fear is that "the wolves" are at the gate again, there to finish off the job from previous losses. That's why this is about much more than a name, it's about history from 60 years ago.

by Upstate NY on Thu Dec 10th, 2009 at 11:28:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Macedonian International News Agency: German MP asks Greece to Leave the EU for the Good of the Union
DW reported on a heated exchange between German parliamentarian Angelika Beer and Greek MP  Micias Marutkiotis.
Beer's reaction came after Marutkiotis wrapped up a speech of how helpful his country had been in the EU integration process of Balkan countries adding "Greece had helped the economy of each Balkan country" This could be a new investment model: a bankrupt country helping others.

Walter Kolbo, former MP and head of the "Macedonian Greek Partnership" reminded his Greek colleague that the German Bundestag had passed a resolution back in 2003 asking Athens to cease their obstructions towards Macedonia, adding Macedonians and Greeks are "Europeans", there is no need for blocking neighbors from getting into NATO and the EU.

MP Angelika Beer, in comparison to Mr. Kolbo, was somewhat sharper and clearer in her reply to the Greek delegation: "You must decide how far you like to push your policies against the wishes of the Europeans. It would be best for you to decide whether you wish to stick to your policies or leave the European Union." 

Ouch!

Sofia Echo [BG]: EU membership talks delay means `disappointment but not surprise' in Macedonia

The decision not to decide a date was taken to give Skopje and Athens time to resolve their dispute about the use of the name Macedonia, the EU's top envoy to Macedonia, Erwan Fouere, was reported as saying.

 

Fouere said that the December 8 decision by the EU Council of Ministers should not be likened to the decision at a Nato summit in Bucharest in 2008 not to invite Macedonia to join the military alliance. Greece was behind the decision not to invite Macedonia to join Nato, against the urging of major members of the alliance including the United States.

Fouere said that the EU decision was made to extend an opportunity for the continuation of name talks with Greece, Balkan Insight said.

European Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn said that "silent diplomacy" was being conducted about the name dispute, adding that the recommendation of the EU foreign ministers was not discouraging, Macedonia's Utrinski Vesnik said, according to Bulgarian news agency Focus.

Continuing to explore the parallel (or not) of the Slovenia/Croatia dispute, Slovenia did oppose Croatian NATO accession but [allegedly, US] pressure was brought to bear on Slovenia and Croatia was allowed into NATO.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Dec 10th, 2009 at 12:01:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, I saw that this morning. I also saw that she belongs to the Pirate Party? First time I heard of that.
by Upstate NY on Thu Dec 10th, 2009 at 01:13:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Just wondering, does Germany adhere to European wishes always? Let's say in regards to Turkey.

Cyprus would be solved instantly if Merkel announces tonight that Germany supports Turkey in the EU.

by Upstate NY on Thu Dec 10th, 2009 at 01:15:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
So I guess it would be OK for Greece if Macedonia (FYROM) stayed Macedonia while Macedonia (in Greece) was renamed South Macedonia? Inner Macedonia?

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Thu Dec 10th, 2009 at 01:45:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The key is, will Macedonia then have univocal rights to the name Macedonia? So that it can sue Greece for expropriated land? For a genocide against Macedonians? For non-recognition of Macedonians in Greece proper? For cultural products bearing the name Macedonia? For a variety of other reasons. For Greece, they woulod find themselves defending against the usage of Macedonia on an EU level. If it were possible to totally derogate against ANY of FYROM's claims against Greece, I think you'd have a good argument. But first, the EU would not permit this perpetually (i.e. prevent a new Macedonia from making claims on Greece or Macedonians from making claims individually) but also the FYROM gov't could not accept such derogations since the diaspora's politics insist on restitution of Greek territory and reparations.

Seemingly, one's identity should be sacrosanct, and I personally acknowledge the Macedonian right to refer to themselves as they wish, but it's a principle that should come with many caveats. Scratch the service in this case and you ask yourself, what if the identity in question was produced and reinforced as a means to dismember territory from another country? What if this same people held an aggrieved sense of injustice from the outcomes of WW1, WW2, the Greek Civil War, and for these reasons had instituted a propaganda campaign meant to brainwash the populace with totally indefensible propaganda that usurped a neighbor's history (Bulgaria has the same problem with FYROM)? What if the top politicians of this country often referred to the stealing of territory at the whims of the great powers? What if the rights to intervene in neighbor's affairs to protect Macedonians living in Greece were writ into the country's constitution? What if the symbol of the city of Saloniki was stamped on the money of that nation? etc.

Check out these state-sponsored newly issued encyclopedias & ads:

http://www.euractiv.com/en/enlargement/macedonia-embroiled-encyclopaedia-row/article-186333

http://www.rferl.org/content/Macedonian_Encyclopedia_Sparks_Balkan_Ethnic_Row/1830215.html

http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/8264/45/

This is a transcript of a 5 minute ad on state-sponsored television:

Divine blessing for you, my Macedonians. I have waited for thousands of years to be called by you. From always with you, from eternity I am coming, I am already among you because here neither time nor space exists. Here, at my place, the time is still. But at your place, the time is now, for me to explain. Your mother earth I have inhabited with three races: the White-Macedonoids, the Yellow-Mongoloids and the Black-Negroids. The rest-all are mulattoes. From you, Macedonians, the descendants of Macedon, I have impregnated the White race and everything began from you, to the Sea of Japan. All White people are your brothers because they carry Macedonian gene. And all the migrations started from your place towards the north. Kokino, Porodin, Radobor, Angelci, Barutnica, Govrlevo, wherever you dig you shall find the truth who you are, why you are and from where are you. Evil diabolic souls obscured the truth for thousands of years and lied to the world.

You couple this sort of thing with scientific "proof" presented that Greeks are sub-Saharan Africans, Albanians a nomadic tribe new to the scene, Bulgarians as falsifiers, etc., and what do you have? This comes from the country's intelligentsia and political leadership. That's not to say there aren't Greek bigots and racists and nationalists, but George Papandreou is not going to give seed money to the next Leni Riefenstahl.

So, to answer you, on the one hand you have the acknowledged history: The vast majority of historical Macedonia exists within Greece.

Whose Macedonia existed first? Greece's did. And I'm not talking about ancient history. You can read research that shows all sorts of Macedonian cultural associations in the area were Greek in the mid to late 19th century.

The Slavic Macedonian consciousness movement which came later was a response to battles between groups that formerly identified as Bulgarians.

And then, after you look at the history, the context for Macedonian identity is troubled. The seemingly innocuous principle of self-identification perturbs when that identity was constructed purposely in a propaganda war against a neighbor, an identity that was concocted initially for irredentist aspirations, and subsequently reinforced to cloak those same aspirations.

Either way, this will not end pretty.

by Upstate NY on Thu Dec 10th, 2009 at 03:28:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series