Display:
Well its only allowed under section 44 of the terrorism act,  in an area designated by the local chief of police. However, the home office refuses to reveal which areas are designated (They are meant to be designated for limited periods of time)  the only area that has been revealed are all railway stations within the UK.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Tue Dec 8th, 2009 at 05:24:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
the only area that has been revealed are all railway stations within the UK.

Makes train blogging potentially awkward.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Dec 9th, 2009 at 12:17:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's a sore issue with the UK's trainspotters.

Which may sound like a joke, but when trainspotters - who are about as dangerous a rained-on khaki bobble hat - start complaining about regular harassment, policing is seriously broken.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Dec 9th, 2009 at 08:42:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But makes reporting on safety hazards difficult, which reduces pressure on the train companies to fix them.

I didn't make this up. There was an ancient law in NYC prohibiting photography in subway stations. Nobody took any notice of it, until some newspaper published pictures of exposed wiring in a station, and the city filed changes. The main outcome was that the law was changed, but after 9/11 they quickly started trying to figure out how to bring it back.

I presume that any self-respecting terrorist will take pictures with his phone, rather than doing something more obvious like these photographers have been doing. They'll just have to prohibit using your phone near a train station,  I guess.

by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Wed Dec 9th, 2009 at 08:48:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series