Display:
That's a fair summary of things. I'd just would like to note that I'm certainly not trying to push the French model on anyone else, just pushing back against people who say the model doesn't work or is bad.

Then there is the partly separate point that by accepting to talk about immigrants in Europe exclusively through the lens of religion, we fall in the cals of civilisations narrative. That's what my "there are no Muslims in France" quip is trying to convey, ie that the very real issues surrounding these bits of the population are usually not predominantly driven by their religion, but by other factors. The religious factor exists, and of course there are people of the Muslim faith in France, but talking about them, and describing them exclusively as Muslims is, in my view, a political mistake.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Fri Nov 6th, 2009 at 08:58:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It hardly surprises me that the statement "there are no Muslims in France" was perceived to be off-putting, confounding and/or dismissive, as well as factually untrue, except in certain specific idealized frames. Given the history of this issue on ET, of which this is at least the second example I have seen, it is hardly surprising that it seemed to exacerbate the discussion. In these situations "quips" can be detonators.  

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sat Nov 7th, 2009 at 12:41:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series