Display:
I sometimes wonder if both the McCarthy-ite HUAC fiasco and the entire Cold War, with its red scares, weren't political moves designed to demonise socialism and communism in the US, and take away their domestic political influence - which was significant, at least until the 1950s.

My read is that this was much more so for Richard Nixon and the HUAC than for McCarthy. It was undoubtedly true for McCarthy's supportes, but, for himself, it was likely more fascist populist opportunism, the successful use of which was like a drug for McCarthy, one that, in the end, was his own undoing.

McCarthy was more than a little bit a mental case and brittle to boot. Nixon famously had his paranoid streak but had much greater resilience. Both were supported by Republican reactionaries who wanted to roll back the New Deal--and who now have largely succeeded.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sat Dec 12th, 2009 at 10:21:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
McCarthy also needed a big, fat red herring to distract everyone from realizing that his war hero stories that he rode into office were all crap.  Far from being the gallant tail gunner, he spent the war test-firing .50s Stateside.
by rifek on Sun Dec 13th, 2009 at 03:47:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series