Display:
.. in the same sense of an organized movement as the reactionary movement that bills itself as "Conservative" (because, as is widely understood, if its a trademark, it doesn't have to be true).

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Tue Dec 15th, 2009 at 10:54:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
But to me it is revealing that I had heard of the TX SBOE while living elsewhere, read articles about it in the "leftish" press, etc. and never learned it was an elected position that had been ceded without a fight to the wackos until I moved to the place. So here is a nationally visible and powerful set of positions that nobody bothered to even ask voters to consider an alternative. It doesn't take a massive organization to run a candidate. if your political activity consists of nothing that actually can produce power, what's the odds of getting anywhere?
by rootless2 on Wed Dec 16th, 2009 at 07:46:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Quite: the Texas School Board was identified by the "Conservative" movement in Texas as a soft target, because they had the organization to be able to do things like identify soft targets. Intelligence and canny strategy can offset resource limits - but only if there is an organized capability to bring them to bear.

Without effective, active and ongoing organizing, what we are left with is the visceral reactions that some number of people are provoked into, which is something that is far easier to cope with through manipulation of the media environment than an active, organized opposition.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Wed Dec 16th, 2009 at 01:35:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series