Display:
Looks like Aftonbladet may have been partly right after all. From AP:
Israel has admitted that in the 1990s, its forensic pathologists harvested organs from dead bodies, including Palestinians, without permission of their families.

The issue emerged with publication of an interview with the then-head of Israel's Abu Kabir forensic institute, Dr. Jehuda Hiss. The interview was conducted in 2000 by an American academic, who released it because of a huge controversy last summer over an allegation by a Swedish newspaper that Israel was killing Palestinians in order to harvest their organs. Israel hotly denied the charge.

Parts of the interview were broadcast on Israel's Channel 2 TV over the weekend. In it, Hiss said, "We started to harvest corneas ... Whatever was done was highly informal. No permission was asked from the family."

The Channel 2 report said that in the 1990s, forensic specialists at Abu Kabir harvested skin, corneas, heart valves and bones from the bodies of Israeli soldiers, Israeli citizens, Palestinians and foreign workers, often without permission from relatives.

In a response to the TV report, the Israeli military confirmed that the practice took place. "This activity ended a decade ago and does not happen any longer," the military said in a statement quoted by Channel 2.

by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Mon Dec 21st, 2009 at 12:50:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
and your credibility?

fool me once

~"When an inner situation is not made conscious, it appears outside as fate." Karl Jung~

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Mon Dec 21st, 2009 at 06:39:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
"may have been partly"

You will have to remove at least one of those qualifiers.

by Trond Ove on Mon Dec 21st, 2009 at 06:58:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
"partly" refers to the fact that there is nothing to suggest that they were actually killing Palestinians for the organs (and nothing to suggest that they were singling out Palestinians, but there was no good reason for Aftonbladet to look for similar stories about Israelis).

"may" referred to whether the AP story itself was credible. But after rereading it, I see no reason to doubt it, so I can drop that qualifier.

by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Mon Dec 21st, 2009 at 07:07:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
"partly" refers to the fact that there is nothing to suggest that they were actually killing Palestinians for the organs (and nothing to suggest that they were singling out Palestinians[...]).

I just reread the Aftonbladet article, and it did not make these claims.

by Trond Ove on Mon Dec 21st, 2009 at 08:32:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks. I obviously couldn't read it because of the language, and took the second-hand accounts on trust. Can one ever believe anything the MSM reports?
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Mon Dec 21st, 2009 at 08:46:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually, Aftonbladet translated it:

"Our sons are plundered of their organs" - English translation of the article by Donald Boström | Kultur | Aftonbladet

Palestinians accuse the Israel Defense Forces of taking organs from their victims.
Donald Boström writes about an international organ trafficking scandal - and about the time he saw the cut-up dead body of a nineteen-year old Palestinian.

We had some discussion on it in august:

European Tribune - SCF: Sweden-Israel kink that became a crisis

This last week a minor crisis has emerged in the relations between Sweden and Israel.

It started with an article in the evening paper Aftonbladet about suspected organ harvesting from Palestinian prisoners in Israel. A bit of to and fro ensued with the Israeli government demanding condemnations the Swedish government would not supply.



A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
by A swedish kind of death on Mon Dec 21st, 2009 at 12:15:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I can see how people could draw the conclusion I stated from the line
The relatives of the dead Palestinians no longer harbored any doubts as to the reasons for the killings,
It doesn't correspond to anything else in the article, but is a careless formulation, to say the least.
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Mon Dec 21st, 2009 at 02:19:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The English translation doesn't say the same thing as the Swedish original IIRC, but sounds less incriminating.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Dec 22nd, 2009 at 04:46:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series