Display:
This came out on Saturday, but I missed it. Did anyone note this news?

Goldman Fueled AIG Gambles
By Serena Ng And Carrick Mollemkamp, Wall Street Journal

Goldman originated or bought protection from AIG on about $33 billion of the $80 billion of U.S. mortgage assets that AIG insured during the housing boom. That is roughly twice as much as Société Générale and Merrill Lynch, the banks with the biggest exposure to AIG after Goldman, according an analysis of ratings-firm reports and an internal AIG document that details several financial firms' roles in the transactions.

In Goldman's biggest deal, it acted as a middleman between AIG and banks, taking on the risk of as much as $14 billion of mortgage-related investments. Then Goldman insured that risk with one trading partner--AIG, according to the Journal's analysis and people familiar with the trades.

The trades yielded Goldman less than $50 million in profits, which were mostly booked from 2004 to 2006, according to a person familiar with the matter. But they piled risks onto AIG's books, which later came to haunt the insurer and Goldman. The trades also gave Goldman a unique window into AIG's exposure to losses on securities linked to mortgages.

I believe a lot of the news was already known about how Goldman profited from the housing bubble and the bailout, but some interstingly BIG numbers from the Murdoch Street Journal nonetheless.

by Magnifico on Mon Dec 14th, 2009 at 02:24:05 PM EST
This is perhaps a redundant comment, but more evidence that without the government bailout of AIG, Goldman Sachs would be little more than a smoking crater in the ground...
by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Mon Dec 14th, 2009 at 03:09:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series