Display:
there was no analysis why this discrepancy between gender survival rates exists, which I'd have thought was the most useful information. Everything else is social studies.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sat Dec 26th, 2009 at 07:53:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
There was some indication in the article: in another village most men were working at a seaside factory and were killed while most women who were further inland survived. I suppose something similar (different workplace locations for men and women) happened, but it's just a semi-educated guess.

Europeans think a hundred miles is a long way. Americans think a hundred years is a long time.
by Bernard on Sat Dec 26th, 2009 at 12:54:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I seem to remember that in some places the men were out fishing.  Their boats rose up and down on the water and their casualty rates were very low.

It was a disproportionate number of women and children who died.  Maybe the women were with the children, and died trying to save them, or because they had to run at the pace of the slowest.  Or maybe in a situation that terrible, where the margin of survival was so thin, a little more muscle mass went a long way.

by Sassafras on Sun Dec 27th, 2009 at 04:28:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series