Display:
Really cool.

I have some colleagues who study Africa, and we've talked several times about how there's a huge untapped market for renewable energy products, particularly in West Africa.  The key being the marginal cost of production.  In many small villages, there is still little or no electricity absent village generators.

And when you are in someplace like central Nigeria, and you are producing electricity with with a 1500 W generator using gasoline. Well, the per kw price is pretty darn high.  You look at something like that and you figure that your getting something like 3.75 kwh per gallon of gasoline.  Even at 0.50 USD per gallon, that's still 0.133 USD per kwh. And considering that getting gas delivered to a village probably raises fuel costs two to three times, small scale wind and solar are intensely competitive. The problem is primarily one of financing.  But, with the marginal cost of electricity so, so, so high, any increased start up costs are overwhelmed by decreased costs of operation.  And with the alternative being so expensive, it's possible to actually make money selling to what we think of as people to poor to buy...

Yet, ironically, some of the best markets for micro to low utility grade renewables are precisely in these countries that lack developed infrastructure.  Particularly so when you look at products like these: (in German)

 

If you look to the product page for the VAT ENAIRGIES 6, which has a top output of 6kwh, you'll see that it kicks in at about 7 mph (11 kph) and at somewhere between 13-16 mph (21-26 kph) you're hitting that 0.75 kwh sweet spot that is comparable to 1500 W generator working at half load (which is what they use to calculate how long a tank of gas will last.)

 The thing weighs around 1800 lbs or 800 kgs.  Which means it's heavy, but you can get it to a location on a truck.  Walking away from Copenhagen, one of the sticking points seems to be finding a way for poor villagers in Africa to turn on the lights without jacking up carbon emissions even higher than they are now.

The easiest weigh to start displacing electric production that uses fossil fuels is to start targeting these applications where the marginal cost is quite high because it makes money to do the right thing here.  This isn't only true in developing countries.  The little wind turbine whose picture I put up here is produced in Munster, NRW, DE and production is starting soon in Muncie, IN, USA (my hometown)  They are for use for street lights and use both a small vertical axis turbine and solar panels.  Street lights are another great area for renewables.  It's a huge cost to get lines to the location (particularly with urban sprawl in the US) and to keep the thing up.  A little money upfront here can go a long way towards saving money in the end.

And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg

by ManfromMiddletown (manfrommiddletown at lycos dot com) on Sun Dec 20th, 2009 at 01:15:59 AM EST
I'd advice against buying WRE units. Solar photovoltaics are cheaper per kWh than those things. For small wind the traditional three blade design also works best (diary will be up this year, I hope).
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Sun Dec 20th, 2009 at 08:22:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's not a matter of either/or though, is it?

To MfM, the financing problem - as I point out - is not difficult to crack if you rebase your thinking about value.

Energy Pools are not Rocket Science, and it was interesting to see the first electronic currency based on electricity launched in Copenhagen the other day. (my bold).

The Concept | Kiwah

A community is like an engine; it makes things happen. The Kiwah is its fuel. Kiwah is a special purpose currency, designed to enable transactions between people, groups and companies that actively want to build a society that is CO2 slim and based on an inclusive world. The unit of account is the Kilowatt-Hour.

Btw, MfM, I just rescued your 'linked in' message from my spam folder....Thanks.

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Sun Dec 20th, 2009 at 11:49:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Small wind has less potential coverage than solar PV. It's more of a niche technology. If you use it, you should be sure that you get something out of it (a lower price than for solar PV, first of all).
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Sun Dec 20th, 2009 at 12:05:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
How does small wind and solar PV compare on EROEI basis?

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
by A swedish kind of death on Sun Dec 20th, 2009 at 05:37:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No clue. Current solar PV now has a payback period of 1 and a half years, I gather, from what I gather. Which given the 30 year lifespan you can reasonably expect is 20:1. I've never seen anything on small wind.
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Sun Dec 20th, 2009 at 07:35:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Could you contact me offline about these VAWTs for the industrial zone off I-69.

I went to school at BSU and my family still lives nearby.

I've written critically about this "project" at

http://www.wind-works.org/SmallTurbines/MuncieVAWT--AnExpensiveDemonstration.html

Muncie VAWT--An Expensive Demonstration--As can be quickly seen in comparison to the Bergey Excel, the VAT-20 kW turbine is overrated by almost three times. Unfortunately, this is typical of the new crop of VAWTs. Designer's and promoters greatly overstate what the turbines are truly capable of delivering. . .

I photographed the Savonious rotors on the light standards about a month ago.

pgipe@igc.org

Paul Gipe

by pgipe (pgipe(at)igc.org) on Tue Dec 22nd, 2009 at 12:30:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series