Display:
The US is already paying off the Taliban to keep them from attacking its convoys. It is already funding local narco-trafficking militias with personal ties to the government through its secret service. SNAFU, and all that.

I think the new initiative of McChrystal is overplayed. I don't think they're going to implement a direct analogue to the 'sons of Iraq' strategy. It's possible that this is just a tool to pressure the Afghan government to play along. And otherwise, the surge can still make sense from a push-pull perspective.

The problem is the fucked up nature of the government and the secret ops that have already been ongoing, as well as the wrongheaded focus on the drug side of the equation. The strategy would be much simpler for the US military if it got into the trade itself (officially).

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Wed Dec 2nd, 2009 at 12:31:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yeah, legalize opium, regulate it and list it on the commodity markets. It could also serve as a new store of wealth for those concerned about the dollar. At least if one took physical possession of the opium it would have intrinsic value for deadening the pain of the economy.

If religion be the opiate of masses, what then be opium?

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Dec 2nd, 2009 at 12:38:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
...the religion of the masses?

"Beware of the man who does not talk, and the dog that does not bark." Cheyenne
by maracatu on Wed Dec 2nd, 2009 at 08:09:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series