Display:
Sounds about right: if they feel they're being prevented from doing their duty for the shareholders they should resign. If only this had occurred to them when they were busy digging the hole for the bank ...
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Dec 2nd, 2009 at 11:46:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
the Bank dug the hole, not the directors. Haven't you learned anything about global finance?  i'm going to join Amnesty for RBS Directors on facebook.

"Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
by Crazy Horse on Wed Dec 2nd, 2009 at 12:17:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
but providing the bonuses isn't really about doing their duty for the shareholders. the bonus system is an internal stitch up for the plutocrat club members.

the people at pension funds(a) and other investment groups who vote for bonuses at banks(b) are people who get bonuses themselves, probably voted upon by the very people who they voted for. Scratch my back and I'll scratch yours. It's got nothing to do with shareholder value.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Dec 2nd, 2009 at 01:48:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No, they believe that bonuses are necessary motivators and just rewards. It's just easy to believe that when you and your friends are the ones getting them.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Dec 2nd, 2009 at 02:43:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Maybe they do, but you can still believe in bonuses as motivators and not have the situation where non-trivial percentages of bank profit are delivered as bonuses to the few instead of to shareholders. My description explains how that current runaway situation evolved.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Wed Dec 2nd, 2009 at 02:56:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series