Display:
I'll handle the "butter issue"; I'll leave the flour to someone else (for now).

To solve this problem we need to know ... dum dum dum ...  the DENSITY of butter so we go to WIKI (who we trust?) which informs us that the density of butter is .911g/cubic cm.  To get to tsp, once again WIKI states that 1 tsp = 4.93 mL (= 4.93 cubic cm) so

Dimensional Analysis Time !!! (wooo wooo!)

(Note:  True Nerds ALWAYS go wooo wooo when it's time to change units.  It's part of the code.)

40 g x (1 cc/.911 g) X (1 tsp/4.93 cc) = (calculator please ...)

9 tsp (yes, only 1 significant figure; that's what you have in 40 g.)

So, your 40 g of butter translates into 9 tsp.

The logic will be the same for the flour; you need the density of the flour and then the appropriate conversion factor to T.

Will post this part then take a shower.  If someone else doesn't jump in I'll do the flour in a bit.

CHEM NERDS ... accept NO substitute!

In the end, might makes right. Nothing has changed since the caveman.

by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Mon Dec 28th, 2009 at 03:48:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Those are teaspoons? Or tablespoons?

Hey, don't chem nerds just have simple tools to weigh stuff in grams? (Like quaint Yurpeens do, in their kitchen?)

Come back after shower. :-D

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Dec 28th, 2009 at 03:57:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
This butter problem was a conversion to TEASPOONS!!  NOT ... I emphasize ... NOT Tablespoons (the bigger guys.)  I'll do the flour (in a bit) to T(ablespoons)

In the end, might makes right. Nothing has changed since the caveman.
by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Mon Dec 28th, 2009 at 04:05:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I need you to convert bushels of corn into metric tons. You'll need the density refs again. It's fascinating.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Dec 28th, 2009 at 04:11:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Shower Time !!!  Back in a bit.

In the end, might makes right. Nothing has changed since the caveman.
by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Mon Dec 28th, 2009 at 04:14:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The only people I once knew who had scales to weigh gram size things were selling weed and the like (decades ago in college).  I don't weigh anything when I cook.  And Truffles says "Hello" to all her European fans.

In the end, might makes right. Nothing has changed since the caveman.
by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Mon Dec 28th, 2009 at 04:09:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh, decades.

How many teaspoons is that?

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Dec 28th, 2009 at 04:13:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
74 playing fields.

Give or take.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Mon Dec 28th, 2009 at 06:27:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
level playing fields would that be?

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Dec 29th, 2009 at 03:07:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Is it a lolcat or a cool cat (*citation needed)?

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Mon Dec 28th, 2009 at 04:56:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, I suggested 3 level tablespoons of butter, which is 3 x 15 = 45 ml/cc, which divided by your 9 teaspoons does indeed work out at 5 ml/cc or (to one significant figure) 4.93 ml/cc, so we in fact agree despite your nerdiness and strange American system of measures.

How can anyone cook using cups, tbsps, and tsps, especially when no one knows how much they are and they differ across the quaint old English-speaking world?

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Dec 28th, 2009 at 04:09:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
... or (to one significant figure) 4.93 ml/cc, ...

One sig. fig. in 4.93 ???  Don't let In Wales catch you posting that; you're looking for a spanking!

In the end, might makes right. Nothing has changed since the caveman.

by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Mon Dec 28th, 2009 at 04:13:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The 5 is the one significant figure. 4.93 -> 5.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Dec 28th, 2009 at 04:15:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
How can anyone cook using cups, tbsps, and tsps, especially when no one knows how much they are and they differ across the quaint old English-speaking world?

Because we have brains the size of planets.

AND we know our 64 times tables.

:-þ

Actually, it really doesn't matter.  The original ingredient list is only approximate.  Depending on the ambient air temperature, humidity, real eggs versus battery raised eggs, Holstein milk versus Jersey milk, etc., etc. the actual As-Made list will be different for each iteration.  As long as the first set is more or less correct in ratio ... it'll work out.

by ATinNM on Mon Dec 28th, 2009 at 07:02:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Intuition and experience, that's how.  Fiddle with any set of measurments long enough, and KNOW what you're trying to make on a deep level, and these things just become sort of obvious.
by Zwackus on Mon Dec 28th, 2009 at 07:37:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series