Display:
Polygamy for all | Khaled Diab | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

They say that hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. But it does: the roaring rage of injured male pride. This was amply demonstrated in Egypt when a female Saudi journalist had the audacity to apply logic and consistency to challenge an area of traditional male privilege.

In an article provocatively entitled "My Four Husbands and I", Nadine al-Bedair quite sensibly posed the logical question: if Muslim men are entitled to marry up to four wives, why can't women, in the spirit of equality between believers, have four husbands?

"I have long questioned why it is men have a monopoly on this right. No one has been able to explain to me convincingly why it is I'm deprived of the right to polyandry," she complains.

The outspoken Saudi then goes on to deconstruct and question the traditional justifications for polygamy, including that, in a traditional patriarchal society, it is a shelter for widows, divorcees and women who can't find a spouse; that men have greater sexual appetites than women and get easily bored; that women can't handle more than one man; and that, if women could have multiple husbands, determining paternity would not be possible (an excuse made obsolete by modern science).



Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Sat Jan 2nd, 2010 at 03:10:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Hee, I read that and it was wonderful watching tese hypocrites tying themselves in knots trying to justify the status quo.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun Jan 3rd, 2010 at 07:02:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series