Display:
I guess in his case, it depends what is meant by "love".  Given his recent antics, I wouldn't hazard a guess.

"Beware of the man who does not talk, and the dog that does not bark." Cheyenne
by maracatu on Tue Dec 15th, 2009 at 05:55:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The love-hate binomial is one of the first resorts of populist demagogues. It has no place in modern democracies beyond a subsidiary role (Sure, We "love" Obama).

In berlusconismo love-hate plays a key, paranoid role. Any criticism of Berlusconi is categorized as hate. Berlusconi only accepts unconditional love- and there are plenty of brainless or opportunistic fans eager to adore him.

This polarization of the body politics leaves no space for argumentation, critical thought or negotiated solutions. Berlusconi constantly argues that he will not speak to "an opposition that hates him" where he is the sole arbitrator of what defines love-hate. He is the sole custodian of the Truth.

Because of his legal trials, for which he is accused of grave crimes, he has increased the virulence of his attacks, culminating in his frankly seditious speech before the EPP Congress recently in which he claimed an absolute sovereignty to govern based on his fictitious popularity.

This evening his majority whip, Fabrizio Cicchitto, denounced " a network of hate" that armed the would-be assassin's hand, on the floor of parliament. He fingered out by name the purported conspirators in this imaginary plot. It's a list of proscription, enemies singled out by a P2 member and brandished in parliament. My solidarity goes to them for their vital, lucid, polemical stance in the defense of public reason and information.

 

by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Tue Dec 15th, 2009 at 06:58:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series