Display:
Great photos.  The amount of beautiful, sparsely populated landscape you have documented in Central Europe is impressive and would be hard to duplicate, outside of parks and wilderness areas, in the USA.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Mon Dec 7th, 2009 at 12:42:49 AM EST
Actually, those beautiful, sparsely populated landscapes were either in parks and wilderness areas, or settlements were just behind the mountain or behind the photographer's back :-)

CountryPersons/km²Persons/mi²
Germany229.3594.0
Czech Republic132.8344.1
Slovakia110.5286.1
Hungary108.5281.1
Slovenia101.2262.1
Austria99.6258.1
USA32.082.9

From Wikipedia. Also from Wikipedia, US states with comparable or higher population density:

StatePersons/km²Persons/mi²
New Jersey452.21,171.1
Rhode Island390.81,012.3
Massachusetts317.6822.7
Connecticut279.1722.9
Maryland221.9574.8
Delaware170.9442.6
New York157.8408.7
Florida130.7338.4
Ohio108.1280.0
Pennsylvania107.1277.4
California90.5234.4

Your Arkansas has just 54.4 persons per square miles.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Mon Dec 7th, 2009 at 07:02:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The big difference is that European towns are almost uniformly beautiful.
by njh on Mon Dec 7th, 2009 at 12:29:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Nope.
by asdf on Mon Dec 7th, 2009 at 07:22:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series