Display:
Why then do I have this gnawing fear that the required Federal audit of balance sheets will gloss over or totally ignore off balance sheet liabilities, which is where most of the true black holes have been stashed?  The rule should be that ANY liability not brought forward at the time of the audit shall first be paid with the personal assets of the corporate officers of the institution and then creditors can go pound sand.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Tue Feb 10th, 2009 at 05:46:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Those off-balance-sheet liabilities have come back onto the balance sheets already. Otherwise we wouldn't be having this conversation.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Feb 10th, 2009 at 05:53:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Those off-balance-sheet liabilities have come back onto the balance sheets already.
Some of them, but all?

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Tue Feb 10th, 2009 at 05:57:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Enough of them to make the banks insolvent already...

But, really, I don't think any of those SIVs or off-balance-sheet "conduits" can still be standing after the last 18 months in the money markets.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Feb 10th, 2009 at 06:00:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I pray you are right.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Tue Feb 10th, 2009 at 07:27:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series