It is going to take a lot of time for this entity to get set up and find willing private partners and, together with them (or thanks to their superior market know-how), analyse the often very complex vehicles involved.
Meanwhile, an audit is going to estimate the banks' exposure to bad stuff. (How that is to be done convincingly without evaluating assets I don't see). There will then be an injection of a capital "buffer", and/or nationalisation (according to the Trojan Horse theory). This may well occur well before the PPIF has got far in its price-setting and allocation tasks. What use will it then be, what will be its role?
I think that if major American banks are nationalised, that will be because it becomes inevitable, not because this unclear, confused communication from Geithner masks a cunning plan to reach that goal without Wall Street seeing it coming.
But I'm not impressed by the very-cunning behind-the-scenes plan explanation. Once Obama's main project for dealing with an urgent financial crisis has failed, I don't quite see what extra leeway to introduce more radical policy he'll have gained.
We shall see.
What evidence is there that Obama works like that, or has ever worked like that?